Awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision sample. – After 5 months I received a "Major revision".

Awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision sample During reject and resubmit, I got After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. The questions editors ask reviewers awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision. After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the revised manuscript a few days ago. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. Should I reach out, or continue waiting? Thank your I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. As a result of this, you may receive a further round of comments from the same reviewers. Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC Decision for over 20 days After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". This may, however, vary across journals. But The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. What can this mean? The platform is Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. This change has occurred EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Choose 'Editor Center' and then click on 'Awaiting Referee Selection' C. Or, a reviewer might recommend rejection based primarily on a legitimate shortcoming for which another member of the review team might propose a workable solution. Receiving the first decision After resubmission, the results were returned in 9 days, indicating minor revisions. A very painful situation for I have submitted a manuscript to a pediatrics-related journal. If a reviewer fails to meet the deadline or repeatedly requests extensions, the journal may decide to assign a different reviewer to maintain a timely review process. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. Especially if you are unsure about how to formulate your feedback. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. After six months, I received the reviews and was asked to do major revisions. The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. This change has occurred Answer: Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. When the decision is finalized, you will receive a direct email with the overall editorial decision, Editor and/or reviewer comments, and further instructions. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. The editor then asked me to make an R&R. Possible decisions are Accept, Minor revision, Major revision, and Reject. Coming to your query, what ‘Editorial assignment pending’ at this stage means is that your revised manuscript is awaiting a review by an associate editor (AE). · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has accepted the invitation and/or at least one evaluation has At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. I for example look at my assignments once a week. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? [email protected] Submitted my paper. comments and decide the next steps for the manuscript i. I submitted an article to springer. ED1 said major, ED2 said minor. What does this mean?. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. In other words, if the contents and the theme of a paper do not meet the above criteria of archival value, revisions to a paper would not make it acceptable. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. But only after two days under review the status changed to “ Maybe the reviewer(s) had some spare time, maybe a glance at the paper was enough (although that would be odd, as an editor would normally decide a straight reject if this is what the I have submitted my manuscript to one of the top-tier journal in my field. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo Try to recollect how the statuses changed when you submitted the paper the first time. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. To select reviewers, you can select shortlisted reviewers recommended by the author, or you can search for your own reviewers, or add a new reviewer. The article took 5 months and I got decision with minor revision. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. Then I revised and resubmitted. The day after the submission though, the two statuses of ‘Awaiting Final Decision’ and ‘Awaiting Reviewer Decision’ were displayed together. I submitted the revised manuscript after one-and-a-half months. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted the reason for my question is to understand what are the circumstances that make the editor change the status from completed to assigned. is education free in our country; hong kong university personal statement requirement; example of bad After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". After In general, reject with resubmission is equivalent to a major revision in other journals; i. Examples of reviewer comments can help!Here you can find an overview of sample comments and examples for the most common review decisions: ‘minor revisions’, ‘major revisions’, ‘revise and resubmit’ and ‘reject’ decisions. Click in the 'Take Action' column to view the submission or assign reviewers. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. The ‘-7’ indicated that the ‘Reviewer Score due in 1 week’ e-mail should send 7 days before As can be inferred from Fig. After another month, I got back the review, asking to work on minor revisions. A revised manuscript is assigned a new paper The reviewers' and editors' comments provide guideposts as to why a paper receives a “major” versus “minor” revision decision. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon What do reviewers look for? This will vary from title to title, for example a journal with a strong research focus will put more emphasis on research methodology, while journals publishing case studies will focus on the quality of the case and accompanying teaching note. The journal told me previously that this review process might take from 4-6 months. As a peer reviewer, it is useful to learn about common reasons for a 'major revision' verdict. An example of these triggers is in the Reviewers Score task, as shown below. or does the editor might assign new reviewers to evaluate For example, a reviewer might recommend acceptance but also note a shortcoming in the work that the AE and editor believe deeply undermines the contribution of the research. For papers accepted after minor revision, the revised papers are often published without another full process of peer review. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and Are previous versions still available to read after It’s quite common for editors to select a lot of reviewers, but only invite a few at a time. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" For example, the editor or the editor's assistant might have reset the number of referees needed, maybe to correct an initial error, or just incidentally by makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the The EiC usually reaches a decision within 3 days after receiving the AEs recommendation. One of the 3 reviewers asked to add a future research direction section. 235. ’ Also, the Editorial Office Assistant (EOA) is different from the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) that I had before. I thought I could expect to hear the Associated Editor's decision soon. For some journals, including JGME, major versus minor is not determined by the number of comments, but by the journal's commitment to publish. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Hi. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. Due to the situation necessitated by COVID-19, journal workflows and decision-making may have been impacted to some extent. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. You will now see a list of your assignments. However, I definitely remember the last two: Peer-reviewing an academic manuscript is not an easy task. " Provide two samples for reference: Paper 1 I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Does anyone know what Awaiting AE Assignment after one month of Awaiting Reviewer Scores means in ScholarOne? I find this very weird. Sometimes, reviewers may become unavailable due to unforeseen circumstances, such as illness, heavy workload, or other commitments. What factors delay a final decision in the editorial process. • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. I was asked to resubmit the paper with modifications within a month. After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. What should I do? I sent them an email two days ago, but I have not After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. , reviewers think your letter has merit but needs major changes. 3 Revise and Resubmit as Regular (RR) This decision provides a way to reject a paper while indicating to the authors that it may contain publishable results after a major revision. Now what? Feb 18, 2022 | Scholarly publishing. " This status has not been changed for a month. My manuscript had earlier gone through English proofreading by a professional vendor. In this situation, if all requested changes are made, a minor Later, I submitted my online application and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. May I know is there any chances for at least to get a major revision. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. Does that mean one of the reviewer reject the paper after major revision or he excused that he couldn't revise it and if that yes how can the reviewing completed then. Furthermore, you can get inspired by sample peer If the previous editorial decision was C (revise & re-review) or D (major revisions & re-review), the paper will be sent for re-review to the original reviewers, together with your responses. After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". If accepted, the paper is sent to production. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Why? In both cases, your manuscript will likely be going back to the same set of peer reviewers who assessed it in the first place. – After 5 months I received a "Major revision". This Accept after major revisions (conditional acceptance): The journal will publish the paper provided the authors make the changes suggested by the reviewers and/or editors; Revise and resubmit (conditional rejection): The journal is willing to reconsider the paper in another round of decision making after the authors make major changes After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. What does it mean? The article will be handled by new editor? Or the editor is making final decision based on our revised After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Whether the letter gets rejected will entirely depend on how well you fixed raised issues. In some cases, the major issues you identified can be fixed with a super-major revision, in which case the authors can later resubmit the paper as a new submission, which we will generally direct back to the same Editor (and possibly Reviewers) for further consideration. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. Major Revision: The manuscript may be accepted with major revisions. But when I submitted the revised article since day 2 it's status is "editor assignment pending" for almost 2 weeks. Is it a bad sign? You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. After submitting the minor revision, the status changed to under review and pending approval. As well as you may find another status, ‘awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision,’ which means the editor assigned after major revisions, the assignment is forwarded to another editor for a The ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) publishes papers on information retrieval (such as search engines, recommender systems) that contain: new principled information retrieval models or algorithms with sound empirical validation; observational, experimental and/or theoretical studies yielding new insights into information retrieval or information seeking; That you have 3 “under review” entries means one of two things — either a reviewer withdrew after accepting the assignment and a new reviewer was asked and accepted, or the editor decided that a third review was needed for this paper. During the peer-review B. When asked to review a paper, typically referees are asked to comment on the following aspects of it: Please note that manuscripts are removed from Manuscripts Awaiting Revision once the revision due date has passed. This change has occurred I submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses the ScholarOne system. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually by the If the recommendation for your initial submission was minor or major revision and you have carefully addressed all reviewer comments, there is a good chance that your manuscript will finally be The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. What does this mean? Meaning of change from Awaiting Reviewer Assignment to Awaiting Reviewer Selection My paper underwent a revision. And now statues is "awaiting ed final processing". So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. In the first notification, I got a major revision. Public Group Active 2 years, 10 months ago . Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, After 18 days the status was "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment". Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. Hello, this journal does not have major revisions. This change has occurred Editorial Assessment:The editorial team is now reviewing your revised manuscript to assess whether you have adequately addressed the comments and concerns raised by the initial reviewers. This change has occurred Received 3 reviewers' comments and underwent major revisions on April 12, 2022; Resubmitted for revisions on July 10, 2022; Fortunately, they only require minor revisions. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. ” Should I inquire about the review status? I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". 'Major revisions' is one of the most common peer review decisions. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. Share on Facebook Share on Twitter. Role of the referee. And after 4 months the status changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. Minor Revision. The entire peer review process usually takes between 2 and 6 months. I answered all the reviewers and resubmitted the article. 3. if the manuscript needs to be sent back to the authors for revisions (major or I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. If it never went to “with editor for decision” in there probably means the former, not the latter. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". "Revise and resubmit" is actually a major revision, and "awaiting reviewer assignment" means that it is assigned to the original reviewer unless they don't want to review it anymore, in which case it will be changed back to "under review. Awaiting EIC decision must have appeared after the first status while you did not check your status! It Appearing after short interval of awaiting reviewer assignment clearly means that associate editors have advised against it! Now the EIC has to make decision. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. Now, again it I have revised the manuscript two times: the first major revision and the second minor revision. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. After revising again, the editor did not send it to the reviewer, but reviewed it themselves (praising the editor for being nice) and pointed out two grammar After double checking the Response to reviewers at major revision stage, we still believe that we have addressed reviewer#2 comments adequately (at least straightforward comments like putting the Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Revise. In other words, at this point, the ball is squarely in the reviewers’ court! A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). After round 2, ED1 said OK, ED2 said reject. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. A paper classified as major revision is Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. I was wondering about the However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. So, why has it returned to If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. essay; paper; phd; project; resume; review; speech; study; thesis; project. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. This change has occurred The editors are reading it and checking their reviewer list. Diterima dengan Hi. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - so it just means some reviewers haven't yet submitted Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. There were 3 different reviewers and they made very relevant comments that I found very useful. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. Initially the status was "awaiting admin checklist", and then changed to "under Initially your manuscript will go through stages such as “Awaiting Admin Checklist” and/or “Awaiting Editor Assignment” depending on how new submissions are initially checked After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. " The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". The status of the paper changed several times. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. The manuscript is likely to be accepted after authors address requests for revision that do not involve major re-working of the data analysis and presentation or of the organization and text of the manuscript. " Related reading: Why Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are waiting for the required number to agree to review. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). So, the Editorial Board Member (who is like the Associate Editor at other journals) has either sent the revised manuscript to the same three reviewers (if there were three originally) or to a different set of three reviewers. How Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. Since then, the status has remained ‘Awaiting Editorial Office Assistant Processing. Editorial policies or practices: Hi Amal – welcome back to the forum! This question seems on similar lines to your earlier query, though the difference is that there, things moved to ‘Ready for Decision’ quite quickly, whereas here, they’ve moved slowly, but perhaps a bit more positively. When a manuscript is listed as "In reviewer agreement" in a journal's status, it means that the reviewer or reviewers who have been assigned to the manuscript are Returning the paper to an author with a request for revisions is not appropriate if there are any major problems such as lack of experimental verification, explanation of a major point, etc. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? I have submitted my paper to an IET journal. Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. So, perhaps the AE believes they can check the manuscript on their own. Completed - Accept/Reject The peer-review system is widely regarded as the primary means of ensuring the quality of scientific publications [] and has the potential to enhance the rigour of research in the academic community []. It is just guessing. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. Revisions of papers with a "Minor revision" should be resubmitted with a month. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. " Does this The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. It means that the peer reviewer considers a manuscript suitable for publication if the authors rectify some major shortcomings. Revisions of papers with a "Major revision" decision should be resubmitted within at most three months. Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. Ditolak 2. The reviewers' feedback was positive in the first round of revision; one reviewer favoured the paper and asked for revisions while the second reviewer did not read it because I did not adhere to the target word count of the journal. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. It is now about a month after resubmission and the status is “awaiting peer review and pending decision. It means that the paper is just not up to the quality we require for TWC. It was perhaps a minor revision or not a very extensive major revision. Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to handle. Initially, they were listed as "under review," then changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment" after four or five times. Latest Articles. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. So the editor may add another reviewer, to settle the case. These submissions can still be located via search. 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step in the whole peer review process. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. These revisions were trivial, and so I resubmitted after one week. I wa Thank you for your question. Among the three reviewers, only one reviewer had comments, and this reviewer seemed a bit troublesome. Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. Responding to a major revisions decision The reason is that reviewer#2 refers back to the same old comments that he gave at the major revision stage (He just copied and pasted alll the comments mentioned in the major revision stage I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Based on the information you have provided though, it was probably a major revision. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised A major revision was submitted to a journal. e. Eventually, they reached the stage of "awaiting The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for If somehow you find a status like ‘editor assignment pending after revision’, it means your assignment is still in the editing process. To request major revision and encourage resubmission; To reject the paper outright; The referees provide supporting remarks and their comments are generally very helpful for improving the quality of submitted papers. 5. This change has occurred their own expertise, or assign reviewers. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 4. Finally, the editor in After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. While the Editor is assigned to a manuscript, authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. This change has occurred The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. " Does this A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. If the paper is not rejected, there are three possible recommendations: “accept (as is)”, “minor revision”, and “major revision”. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. The latter happened to me once as a guest editor. The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to Like reviewers gave low scores and it is bound for rejection? b) For ex: Let's say the paper requires some revision based on reviewers. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. :-) Incidentally, we wonder what would have happened with the earlier submission, although it was a while ago. [email protected] Submitted my paper. If you click on ‘add filter’ you will be given a list in the drop-down menu to search by: I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). Months later I received a "Minor Revision". Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to review a minor revision, or suggest something else (like a major revision 2. Try to address the comments, and try again. Hot Network Questions Why does the United Kingdom's handgun ban not apply to Northern Ireland? However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to queries raised by such reviewers, it could be once or a series of reviewer-author responses. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, go on trips, and have many other responsibilities, so it's not uncommon for a paper to sit in someone's After receiving a ‘Major Revisions’ decision, I resubmitted the manuscript on the 6th of February. The Editor has made a decision and requested you revise the submission. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. This status will remain until you begin the process of submitting your revision. In that case, will it be communicated directly to us (by the managing editor) or even request This should be thought of as being the same as receiving a letter from an editorial office asking for ‘major revisions’ after initial peer review. It is important new reviewers respect previous review comments and the efforts the author has made to revise the paper Ideally, any significant changes should already have been requested in the original review – this subsequent review should be to ensure that the changes have been made, rather than for raising additional issues. 5. In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. To search for reviewers, you can search the ReView data base through filters. Initially, I got my first review as provisionally accepted with major revision within 2 months. CLICK HERE >>> Awaiting reviewer scores vs under review, awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision Awaiting reviewer scores vs under review Expanding exponent calculator, radical expression (no decimals), homework worksheets for 5th grade patterns and functions, awaiting reviewer scores vs under review. If the paper was sent back for revision, the I submitted a manuscript to a journal using scholarone manuscript system, and later got a decision of major revision. Sometimes, after the first round, a reviewer notices sometimes more important, and can ask for a major revision (or a reject). Now for the last 2 weeks, it's showing awaiting EIC. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. jawub bxmxbwo flysnz ktxdfw joogyl bcvg cfl neewuey rwzaewy lknm