Awaiting reviewer invitation after revision example. This change has occurred .

Awaiting reviewer invitation after revision example I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. This change has occurred 2022. Ok, so you’ve agreed to review the paper. 4 . This change has occurred Subject field: Quartiles: Rank: Percentile: Category: Engineering Subcategory: Electrical and Electronic Engineering When prompted by an email notification, log in to your editor center and find the manuscript from the dashboard link “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. forward. . 07. 24 awaiting reviewer selection 7. , line numbers, if required by the journal. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also mention that you re-submitted your manuscript after major revisions. I sent my research work to an sci indexed journal. automated. Months later I received a "Minor Revision". I answered all the reviewers and resubmitted the article. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. contained. Re-submitted after revision on 7. 01-08—Paper Submitted 03-10—Awaiting Reviewer Selection 06-04—Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 06-17—Awaiting Reviewer Scores 07-31—Awaiting Recommendation 08-04—Major Revision 08-23—Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 10-03—Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 10-20—Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10-28—Major Revision 11-05—Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 11 [TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL] Hello, you are Visitor Number 202536 on this page. On the Reviewer Main Menu, click on "New Reviewer Invitations. 17 major revision 22. same "review complete" status but different date. I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). 1 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2021. I for example look at my assignments once a week. This mainly reflects two problems. are. These status changes indicate that the journal is working on getting your A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Therefore, please only make this recommendation if you believe all the major concerns can be addressed in one revision. 2. 221128 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 221202 Reviewers My paper underwent a revision. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. " I'm unsure what these status changes It recieved "minor revisions" a bit over a month ago, and I submitted the revisions a little over three weeks ago. 25: Accept Difficulty was fine, but the speed was a bit slow. Submitted on 11. This change has occurred Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. This change has occurred I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. 20 awaiting AE recommendation, awaiting EIC decision, minor revision 22. Do not put the blame onto the reviewer; try to correct the mis-communication on your end. 5. Once you receive a review invitation, please respond at your earliest convenience even if you cannot review. 6. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. There is rarely an accepted rubric for what constitutes minor vs major, and editors have the prerogative to accept a reviewer's comments, overrule them (so to speak), reject them outright and find another reviewer, or tweak them to make them make So if you log in to check on progress several weeks after submission and find your manuscript at this stage, it doesn’t necessarily mean that no action has been taken. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where A positive response may be more likely if you tailor the invitation to the reviewer; If there is a specific reason why you are inviting them, then include a note on this toward the beginning of the invitation. " This will help you decide whether you are able to review the manuscript. I had to wait for one month to start the review process after making revisions. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. The major revision took 1 month and 21 The manuscript status has changed from "Under Review" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores". I submitted a manuscript in late August, and the article's status hasn't changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" in the last four weeks. As a reviewer, you are under no obligation to continue providing reviews. If you think that there is a chance that you would give the manuscript a preferential treatment, for example due to a Then on September 19th, AE invited another batch of reviewers for review, and the invitation results were returned on September 25th (again, all reviewers rejected the invitation). However, after the third revision, I received another request for revision, and this time it was from a third reviewer. If the paper is really as badly written as you are saying, then most likely I would spend less than an hour in the review and reject it. 审稿人可能暂时不可用：原审稿人有 6. After 28 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer confirmation". 24, accepted on 12. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. 13. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. We value your expertise in the area and your opinion on the manuscript you review, including its quality, novelty, and importance. This change has occurred If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. email. , it can be math, comp sci etc. Please note the timeframe: you must respond to the invitation within three (3) days and complete the review within ten (10) days. However, it was under review for 5 months. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. 11. Review guidelines. Moreover, authors may reveal more information after a revision, and reviewers finally 'understood' the paper, and hence, recommend a reject or an accept. Recently. 221128 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 221202 Reviewers 2023. " In the Action Column on the left, click on "View Abstract. How long does this phase generally take? How long should one wait before reaching out to the administrator? Thanks for the advice in advance. The first reviewer has explicitly stated that they are satisfied with the changes made. Journals have target acceptance rates ("pages to fill") that may influence this as well - for example, through head editors pressuring AEs (this is, thankfully, not very common). I revised and resubmitted. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. 对于论文小修后出现"awaiting reviewer assignment"的情况，通常并不会直接返回给原来的审稿人来审稿。原因有以下几点：1. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. This change has occurred I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. This change has occurred • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. 16: Awaiting Recommendation 2022. I'm curious if we are still waiting for reviewers to accept the review of the manuscript, like Awaiting Reviewer Invitation, or it's different, and the reviewing process is started already. Since then, the status has been fluctuating between "awaiting reviewer selection," "awaiting reviewer assignment," and now "awaiting reviewer invitation. In this section: NEW! Featured Author Support; Tracking your submission; My paper has been accepted – what next? Appeals and rebuttals; BMJ Article Transfer Se During this period, we got a chance to make minor revision. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. However, the editor asked me to improve my abstract, introduction, and structure (as a second major In these cases we’d request that you accept the review, and be appropriately critical, per below. 08. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting At the 1st review, the referees' have written positive statement. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. the. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. 15 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2022. next. Bowling Green State University reviews each After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 19 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2023. The status changes to "awaiting reviewer assignment" when the editor has selected reviewers for your paper and has sent out review invitations. If you are unable A reviewer may not read an article in detail in the first pass. I have revised the paper according to the referees' comments. 10. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. We request that authors suggest reviewers in their cover letters, but we also leave it at the Editor’s discretion to select appropriate reviewers. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. 28 submitted after minor revision 22. Especially if you are unsure about how to formulate your feedback. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. 0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review: Reviewed 2023-02-18 15:22:27 After the minor revision was uploaded, it has been showing "awaiting reviewer invitation". g. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. This change has occurred Whether you are looking for information on designing an academic or scientific article, constructing a scholarly argument, targeting the right journal, following journal guidelines with precision, providing accurate and complete references, writing correct and elegant scholarly English, communicating with journal editors or revising your paper in light of that Yup, agree. i work in a journal, and sometimes reviewers ask us more time because theyre busy, other times we need to find a new reviewer, and this whole process takes a lot of time "awaiting reviewer invitation" means that it is awaiting an invitation to be reviewed. After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. This change has occurred Geophysics editors and the SEG publication staff have made strong efforts to reduce the review and publication turnaround times. So, why has it returned to 2022. An example of Comments to the Author: “This paper was reviewed by three experts, who After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The identified reviewers are being formally invited to review your manuscript. ) Did you receive the decision letter after the first round and resubmit it? As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. This change has occurred Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2024-11-18 10:37:38 Awaiting reviewer invitation on May 30, 2023. Dear Dr. 5 Submit Revision 2023. ) Did you receive the decision letter after the first round and resubmit it? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. And until now, the status has not changed for two months. Sorry! nothing found for. This change has occurred After submitting. Since then the status changed to "awaiting referee scores" then a bit later to "awaiting recommendation", which was the status for about two weeks, and a few days ago it changed back to "awaiting referee scores". Or maybe you're asked to revise the manuscript extensively. awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee Communicate clearly in submission, review and revision. But here the chances are 50:50 depending on the reviewers comments. Examples of reviewer comments can help!Here you can find an overview of sample comments and examples for the most common review decisions: ‘minor revisions’, ‘major revisions’, ‘revise and resubmit’ and ‘reject’ decisions. Could simply be the editor disagreed with what a reviewer said. If so, go ahead. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". This change has occurred Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. The full manuscript will be accessible after the review assignment is accepted. " Does it mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. After sending a reminder, I quickly found a reviewer, and received their feedback within one month. There is a high probability that new reviewers will For example, you may specify which field the topic of your paper belongs to (e. This change has occurred The Awaiting Reviewer Invitation queue is where manuscripts appear if the SE has selected reviewers but has not yet sent the invitations. Reviewer. 01 awaiting reviewer invitation 22. 8 Awaiting AE Recommendation This situation generally occurs when the editor invites the original reviewers but someone declines the invitation, resulting in not meeting the minimum requirement for the number of reviewers. Decision notification e-mails and what they mean. ) Did you receive the decision letter after the first round and resubmit it? Select. (for example, if they were entirely satisfied with the previous version). This change has occurred After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". Geophysics is now a leader among I recently received the reviews/comments for an article submitted few months back to a journal. 05. 23, major revision on 10. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". Respond to a Review Invitation. One of the referee suggested minor revision, while the other suggested major revision. round of reviews or jump to editorial decision immediately – this mostly depends on the magnitude and nature of the revision. in. Rarely, the editor may invite comments from a new reviewer – the editor should explain why this fresh review is sought. 0 month(s) Result: Rejected SAMPLE 2. 14: Revised 2022. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? Popular Articles. Assess and 20-May-2024 Submitted 01-Jun-2024 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 07-Jul-2024 Awaiting AE Decision 09-Jul-2024 Minor Revision (2 weeks) 21-Jul-2024 revised manuscript submitted 22-Jul-2024 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 02-Aug-2024 Awaiting AE Decision (w/o Awaiting Reviewer Scores status) 06-Aug-2024 Awaiting Decision Approval 07-Aug-2024 Minor I have submitted a manuscript to a ScholarOne journal. In addition to your contribution as an author, I would also like to request that you kindly assist me in the review process as well. Finally hired, the processing time in the middle was really long, but the actual modifications were not too strict. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. One of the new reviewers made several rounds of incorrect comments. 3. One of the 3 reviewers asked to add a future research direction section. In that case, will it be communicated directly to us (by the managing editor) Write a review: Reviewed 2023-02-18 15:22:27 After the minor revision was uploaded, it has been showing "awaiting reviewer invitation". 28 submitted 22. 2 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2022. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. The paper was then sent to two new reviewers. The task is then passed back to the editor or For papers with significant revisions, the editor may choose to send the article back out for peer review. A week has passed since I submitted the revision, but the status in ScholarOne remains unchanged. If the reviewer did not catch the novelty of your approach, you should have highlighted it more. In the second pass, he/she may review the paper in more details if an editor is thinking of pursuing a paper. The first round of reviewer assignment took a relatively long time, almost 2 months. I was hesitant to remind them, but luckily it got accepted after a year. 11 Major Revision 2023. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. If you have a known conflict, then you should always decline the review invitation. First of all, do the review ahead of schedule, as soon as you can, and before the arbitrary 6 week deadline. 2022. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". 03. 01. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". For Manuscripts For Response Letter new. Usually, those papers seem to be unanimously rejected, and for most part are low-effort for the reviewers. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 2024-08-02: Awaiting EIC Recommendation, Major Revision 2024-09-02: Resubmitted, Awaiting Admin Processing 2024-09-03: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2024-09-11: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-09-16: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2024-09-17: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-12-04: Awaiting EIC Decision 2024-12-04: Accept The journal is very good, and the After submission, I got a major revision decision from two reviewers. Was your notation non-standard, for example? And if so, was it completely and clearly explained in Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. In the case The most likely scenario seems to be that the editor send your work after minor revision to the referee who was asking for it. 29: Awaiting Decision 2022. Recently, it was For example, you may specify which field the topic of your paper belongs to (e. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon Duration of Peer Review: 0. completed. If you wanna know in detail what is going on, the only option you have, is to e-mail the editor. Add additional templates. about academic proof-reading, what to do in this situation? 4 "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision" 5. 17 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 11. Logging In 1. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision" 0. to. 26 awaiting reviewer invitation Show Review in Original Language (0) Thank | ltcugb: Author: ltcugb Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0. 5. 论文小修后await. This means that potential reviewers have Possibility of acceptance when the editor clearly states that another revision will likely lead to a rejection. After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Will reviewers focus on Can I use bootstrapping for small sample sizes to satisfy 5 SAGE Track Login Page Login Page Tabs Log In: The page to log into SAGE Track and access additional resources. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. To check the status of your submission in o ScholarOne: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation . However, if the status returns to "Editor assigned," it means that the feedback received from the reviewers necessitates further revisions or modifications. 5 Accept 2024. 22. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: At least 4 reviewers have been selected, but less than 4 have been invited. So we sent query to the editor. – For revisions, the process starts over again – selecting reviewers, obtaining reviews, and making a recommendation. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Now I am curious about what this might mean. minimum would be either two or three depending on the publication but the associate editor might have After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Go to your SAGE Track journal’s login page Journal Profile; Journal Title: Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery: Journal Title Abbreviations: QUANT IMAG MED SURG: ISSN: 2223-4292: E-ISSN: 2223-4306 For Manuscripts For Response Letter new For LaTeX For Annual Review and Tenure For Books new. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. On the other hand, I feel it may be inappropriate that he sent me the piece after submitting it to a journal. Today it went back to "awaiting Review and cite MANUSCRIPT REVIEWING protocol, troubleshooting and other methodology information | Contact experts in MANUSCRIPT REVIEWING to get answers 22. workflow . Thanks! Here’s a process and then a format that I recommend in this case. 26 awaiting AE recommendation 22. Because "reviewer10" is written, I would assume that the paper was reviewed by at least 6 reviewers. person. What could be Prior they told me that revisions in this stage only take 2-3 weeks (and last time they had to switch out a reviewer because they took so long, after my requests). After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred 221116 Major Revision 221127 Awaiting Admin Processing 221128 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 221202 Reviewers Assigned 230120 Awaiting Recommendation 230124 Accept Translation: 220909 Awaiting Editor assignment 220917 Reviewers Assigned 220927 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 221026 2023. For ex: Let's say the paper requires some revision based on reviewers. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. "awaiting reviewer invitation" means that it is awaiting an A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. Checking central formatting requirements, e. A reviewer is just a random sample of your future readers. Click the blue “Take Action” checkmark. Awaiting reviewer assignment on June 3, 2023. What does this I had a revision decision, and after I submitted the revision, the status went to "Under review", and after about 4 weeks, it has now changed to "Awaiting reviewer scores". Translation: 21. After review you may get two options major or minor revision Finally hired, the processing time in the middle was really long, but the actual modifications were not too strict. 30: Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2022. Awaiting AE recommendation on June 18, 2023. Step 10. " Does this mean that my manuscript needs to go through another round of review? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After conducting additional experiments and making careful modifications, we resubmitted the paper on April 10th. This change has occurred I checked the link again after 3 days and I noticed that the date has changed to 19th of April (check the attached image) with the same status of "Review Complete". Should I decline the review invitation in this case? I would love to review this piece because it is my main research topic. [name], On behalf of _____, I am writing to invite you to serve as an external reviewer of Bowling Green State University’s _____ major, in the spring/fall of 20__. Conflict of Interest: If you have been asked to review a manuscript and have a potential conflict, then please consult the Editor. Accepted on June 23, 2023. 06 awaiting reviewer scores. Checking compliance with length requirements, if any. 2021. This change has occurred Hi. 小小小西瓜 2023-06-30 Is my current status "awaiting reviewer selection" mean that it is ready for review? 2023-02-17 Minor revisions based on reviewers' comments, three reviewers 2023-03-03 Responded to reviewers' comments After 5 months I received a "Major revision". I firmly believe that the I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. ) and how the first round review went (e. Reviewer 2024. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural For example, you may specify which field the topic of your paper belongs to (e. Create An Account: The page to begin creating a new account in SAGE Track. Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2019-07-16 19:55:33 10-Apr-2022 submit 23-May-2022 Major Revision 06-Jun-2022 Revised 08-Jun-2022 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 06-Jul-2022 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 07-Jul-2022 Awaiting Reviewer Scores Show Review in Original Language (0) Thank | Strive: Peer-reviewing an academic manuscript is not an easy task. There are several decisions that authors may receive after submitting their paper to one of the Society's journals: Reject wit I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. . However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. To check the status of your submission in o EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. 22 awaiting admin processing 5. Took more than 9 months. This change has occurred . 8. 11 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 7. There can be multiple rounds of Review and cite MANUSCRIPT REVIEWING protocol, troubleshooting and other methodology information | Contact experts in MANUSCRIPT REVIEWING to get answers It may include for example: Checking for missing or broken files. Learn more about this process and what you should look for. You could send out an e-mail, but im pretty sure it is in fact still stuck with a reviewer. All the reviewers overall appreciated the content and the usefulness, but also suggested corrections (varying from minor to major) : typos, better title and abstract, reorganizing the material, better exposition at certain places, adding more benchmarks; that need to be After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Typically, the AE invites the same set of reviewers, although there is the option to add new reviewers (if additional input is needed), or drop some (for example, if they were entirely satisfied with the previous version). 04. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. 8 Minor Revision 11. 10-Apr-2022 submit 23-May-2022 Major Revision 06-Jun-2022 Revised 08-Jun-2022 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 06-Jul-2022 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 07-Jul-2022 Awaiting Reviewer Scores Show Review in Original Language (0) Thank | Strive: Author: CX330 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 2. The reviewer forgot to respond, so I sent a reminder letter. Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed Popular Articles. The status of the paper changed several times. Grant Editing ; Translation ; Publication Support. Then I revised and resubmitted. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. status changes to "awaiting reviewer assignment" when the editor has selected reviewers for your paper and has **SAMPLE REVIEWER INVITATION EMAIL (Author)** Dear Professor _____, You have recently submitted a chapter for possible inclusion in the upcoming book, **** Insert book title here ****. On February 28th, we received the first round of revisions, which included two major revisions and one minor revision. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. This will help us the AE to find other reviewers in a timely manner. Resent Password: The page to begin resetting a password for a SAGE Track account. On April 20th, we received an acceptance email. How can I check the status of my submitted paper? Modified on Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 04:59 PM. Hi everyone. Once the requisite number of reviewers accept the invitation, the status will A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer review to editorial decision making: how the AE procures the completed reviews, assesses them, and finally comes to a decision on whether to accept the manuscript, request revisions, or reject it. Did the editor find new reviewers After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 28 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2024. There were 3 different reviewers and they made very relevant comments that I found very useful. The status after 3 days . How to review revised manuscripts. After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. 01 Accept I waited for 3 months for the first round of review, always awaiting reviewer assignment. This change has occurred A reviewer may not read an article in detail in the first pass. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. If a manuscript is rejected, do not give up. That said, it's very helpful if the same set of reviewers agree to review a revision. – • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. links. responses:-If. , it may be conditionally accepted. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Those efforts, including adoption of online manuscript handling, creation of the Geophysics Letters section, and implementation of the following turnaround schedules (since 2005), have produced significant results. If the reviewer does not respond to the invitation, that is a strong indication that the reviewer is I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. 8 Awaiting AE Decision 11. 1. 05 awaiting reviewer assignment 22. however is to try to address the reasons why you weren't understood. This change has occurred After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Status: Under review 2023/5/26 Status: Accept!" Kevin 2022-09-29 As of now, it I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. This change has occurred After review you may get two options major or minor revision. At the same time, badly written papers are low-effort for the reviewer. 09. "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision" Solid Mechanics monograph example: deflection results are same for different materials? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. If you are unable After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review: Reviewed 2024-12-26 10:25:43 Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2024-11-13 16:29:49 Journal of Geographical Sciences Submitted After the minor revision was uploaded, it has been showing "awaiting reviewer invitation". Journal After about six months and 3 revisions, of which 2 were major and 1 was minor, I re-submitted the article. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. After 14 days, I received the decision [communication] that both the reviewers agreed that I had addressed their questions and that the paper could be published. list. Then it will take probably one month to get your work accepted. Scientific Editing . 2 Accept with Minor Revision 2022. After 4 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The identity of the authors and content of submissions must remain strictly confidential to those outside the review process until the manuscript is published. Or that what a reviewer thinks is major is actually minor or vice versa. 29 submitted after Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2020-07-29 14:56:15 A general-level journal is of the same level of DCDS, may be slightly better. 14: Reminder 2022. 30 Accept After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Provide two samples for reference: Paper 1: Application of data fusion in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS): Accept As Regular Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. I have received minor comments (only a few text corrections) from the referee who suggested major revision at the 1st review. 12. fns eyboque csmv pfoj kedoqp vwtrib dbgki tfvkrbko hdhbrw ymet