Awaiting reviewer selection after revision reddit. Mine was a bit of an exception.
Awaiting reviewer selection after revision reddit. The EiC at that time said they'll look .
Awaiting reviewer selection after revision reddit I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted a paper (meta-analysi) to a journal and it was sent for peer review the next day. The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). Nothing seemingly wrong, it just took that long. That said, it's very helpful if the same set of reviewers agree to review a revision. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" If you received reviewer comments, then you would be able to resubmit after resolving those. Pretty much the best outcome one can hope for in my field (biomedical science) when submitting to a decently high IF journal, I think? Do most of the post peer review rejections with these journals come after the first round of review? As a reviewer, you are under no obligation to continue providing reviews. While the reviewers had explicitly mentioned that there were minor issues, with about four issues a piece, the editor had requested a major revision. The status of the paper changed several times. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. Under review. I have previously published in the same journal I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. It sucks when you get positive reviews with comments you can easily address, only for the editor to reject the I have submitted a revision to an elsevier journal after incorporating the suggestions from the reviewers. The reddit for students of Concordia University of Montreal, Quebec / Le reddit des étudiants et étudiantes de L'université Concordia Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. The table shows a blank row. This change has occurred Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. It sounded like their "under review" meant Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. Reply reply The Reddit Law School Admissions Forum. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Reviewer 2 hates me and I‘m sure I won’t be able to The reason is that reviewer#2 refers back to the same old comments that he gave at the major revision stage (He just copied and pasted alll the comments mentioned in the major revision stage 投了一篇IF较低的SCI，两个审稿人明确建议小修后接受，也较好回答；但主编给了大修， 今天我终于修改完上传了，投稿状态就立马显示：awaiting reviewer selection，借该平台咨询大神们，主编是选择原来的审稿人还是换审稿人？谈谈你们的大作审稿阅历吧。 The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. Is this I have a manuscript at Nature Communications that went out to review. About 2 months ago I submitted a paper of mine to a journal via the “scholar-one” submission platform. Handling the R&R is important. Awaiting Initial Packet Review Awaiting Assignment to Scroll Awaiting X Approval; List ID X##-FY; X days in DoD approval cycle Awaiting selection for publication of orders published: SO# XXX; Date Other unique pit stops include: Awaiting Case Manager Review Awaiting AGR control grade Awaiting surgeons office Hi. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. Reviews completed: 0 Review invitations accepted: 0 Review invitations sent: 2+ Why does it take too long for a reviewer to either accept o reject a revision invitation? and What should I do about this? What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Answered by Editage Insights on 16 Mar, 2020 . In the first notification, I got a major revision. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. During this time, the editor looks for suitable reviewers for your paper and sends out I submitted a paper to a journal that used scholarone and the reviewers recommended a major revision. Half a year thrown away. For "good" business journals the rejection rate is something like: 30% desk rejected by the editor before going to review, 40-60% rejected in the first round of review, 10-20% rejected in subsequent rounds of review, only 5-10% papers submitted are actually published. After the review scores come back, a manuscript then Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. This change has occurred I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? If they do reject it without review, that week delay the paper was probably on the AE's to-do list. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! Awaiting Reviewer Selection. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. The journal may be having a challenge finding the appropriate reviewers (both in terms of numbers and I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". And I am sure neither of them was the initial reviewer. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". While the differences in average review time between one field and another are staggering (one month for the Whole process in neuroscience, 8 months in engineering), usually it's something like you don't even see the choice of the editor and maybe it's 3-4 days between when it gets to With a typical ScholarOne configuration, "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that it is actually out with (at least some) reviewers, while "Under Review" would instead mean the previous stage, where it is being considered by the handling editor(s) and might still be rejected without review. This change has occurred • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. Note that the time it takes for an editor to Plenty after one round of reviews, a couple after two rounds. The first status was (awaiting degree reports) and suddenly changed after 34 days to (decision awaiting) and now change to again ( awaiting referee reports) Kindly give info Cite 2 Recommendations Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". For further insights, you may go through this related query by another researcher: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? So, great. They likely have requested another review. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. This change has occurred I contacted the journal several times, but there was no reply. Post any questions you have, there are lots of redditors with admissions knowledge waiting to help. If the RE thinks it is worthy, they assign reviewers. It is just guessing. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. This change has occurred I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. 编辑部或审稿人正在审稿，前者对稿件录用倾向做 Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. It went to review three times, and every time, it was kicked back because I didn't have an SS Trust credit. IMPORTANT NOTE: Any comments with links to Fiverr will be It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). 编辑已接手处理，正在邀请审稿人中。 7. Now, again it . As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. For a major revision typically the Maybe. ScholarOne: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation I submitted a manuscript in late August, and the article's status hasn't changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" in the last four weeks. a) Is it However, there was one recently that wasn’t approved exactly at the 3 week mark, but was approved a very few days after that date. I checked the link again after 3 days and I noticed that the date has changed to 19th of April (check the attached image) with the same status of "Review Complete". On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. Now I am curious about what this might mean. Note that an Edit link appears Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. My paper underwent a revision. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. This change has occurred My journal submission status is still “awaiting reviewer selection” after nearly 3 months. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo Review complete: This is the largest variance part because some reviewers agree to review but don’t actually submit one, some reviewers decline, some reviewers never respond to the invitation, and so on. . This change has occurred A major revision was submitted to a journal. Then I revised and It sounded like their "under review" meant basically "Under Editor's Review". So the thing is, I have been looking quite often on the Elsevier tracking system and it seems that many reviewers were invited (2+), after 2 months and only 1 accepted to review. This change has occurred If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. So, there is a second “Under Review” line item above this, indicating the time that a second person agreed to review the manuscript. View all Q&As on this topic Visit the Q&A Forum. Peer Review in Progress. ” So wasn’t sure if my packet (submitted back in February) is finally being finalized, or if I need to wait it out a little longer with a few more steps in the process. I was wondering about the A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). Reviewer 1 recommended acceptance with minor revisions and Reviewer 2 wanted major revisions before considering it further. But, while the RE is deciding, the software I'm familiar with defaults to "Assigning reviewers". I thought it may take 3 months or so for reviews to come in, but I am starting to get worried that it may potentially take longer than this. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. This change has occurred [email protected] Submitted my paper. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. The main concern of the reviewer was to add the details in methods section and some amendments in the text. This subreddit is temporarily closed in protest of Reddit killing third party apps, see /r/ModCoord and /r Please be civil, keep it on topic, and follow the subreddit rules and reddiquette. For most manuscripts, in the first round of review, usually two peer reviewers are selected. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. 査読者への依頼待ち. Review Settings . The status has been stuck in "Under Review" since submission. I want to know how long will this status last. The initial peer reviews pointed out some flaws, so we were invited to submit a major revision. The manuscript was sent back to the reviewers as it was a major revision. I think two weeks later the status changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment" then today it changed to "awaiting ED decision". Mine was a bit of an exception. Or check it out in the app stores TOPICS. How long does this phase generally take? How long should one wait before reaching out to After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. You might get a totally different reviewer pool, though. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. I can't find the exact average time but for most papers, it took two to three months between submitted, revised, and accepted status. Is this the same stage as pending decision approval? If I win this one it should push me to 100% P&T. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 1. This was for an I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. Editorial review team inadvertently sent the revised paper to new reviewers instead of previous reviewers. If only one reviewer agrees to review and all the others In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. Not sure what the difference is. I submitted my manuscript to a journal. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. What does it mean? Have the reviewers started working I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. Because the editor requested 2 reviewers for this paper (the default for JGR-Space Physics), the status of the paper reverts back to “Contacting” because the system still desires another reviewer. 1. Now what? Feb 18, 2022 | Scholarly publishing. 编辑很快做出决定。若未经审稿人评审（letter或correspondence除外），稿件几乎都会被拒绝。 6. This change has occurred However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. Hi. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. The editor seemed enthusiastic about the paper, and asked for the revisions before acceptance. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. My personal definition of major-revisions as a reviewer is that I'm asking the author to do additional experiments or analysis, but if they do that work, the paper is suitable for publication. After 2 months of peer review process, the response was “moderate revision has been requested” and they told me that the new version is Hello all, I have an article under review after a major revision with a journal. The first time I contacted was when a whole year was passed without even a single response. Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. I addressed every single comment of reviewers and made all the suggested changes. Now, this status has remained for 18 days. You can usually get things moving by sending a friendly follow up — I got one pushed through this way a month ago after it was “awaiting editor assignment” for 2 months. What can this mean? The platform is Hi Chase. Does it mean the work will be After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". Awaiting EA (Associated Editor) decision. The status after 3 days . 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. What do I do? So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. But my question is as below. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. Related reading: After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. After a week the status changed to “Under Review”. g. Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. I got minor revision in the first round of review. I also told them that “if it takes longer or they do not respond, I consider withdrawing and resubmitting the manuscript to another journal”. Today it went back to "awaiting I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). same "review complete" status but different date. There are so many submissions these days, sometimes editors have to reject good papers that could be strengthened after review. Once enough reviewers have been selected, the manuscript will move on to the next stage. When I asked about my status, the editorial manager said that the handling editor is still assessing whether they would send my manuscript for review. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Two of the three reviewer completed their reviews within a week whereas the third one has taken about 2 months but still has not submitted his/her report which makes But some people say "Awaiting Reader Selection" is different from " "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing; Animals & Pets The under review date changed after 25 days from the first Under Review Reply reply More replies. Or check it out in the app stores The first reviewer stated that if the article is re-written, it could be published. The Elsevier Tracking system shows the following: Detailed Reviewer Activity. The EiC at that time said they'll look If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. Is it a bad sign? It means nothing. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 2023 at 12:35. This change has occurred I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I am really Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. Anyway, they seem to have found the required number of peer reviewers now, and your I submitted a manuscript to a scientific journal. A manuscript typically gets a desk review by the Editor-in-Chief. If it is not realistic, move on to another journal. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. If it passes it may be assigned to a subject matter expert Review Editor, who does another desk review. Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. - Prolific will auto-approve anything that’s still sitting there, awaiting review, at (or possibly just after), the 3 The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. This change has occurred I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. A week after submitting that, I did another individual paid form 1. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. A sudden change of status could also mean that the Associate Editor is facing challenges in I have submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. The new reviewers recommended rejection based on points we argue were incorrect. Back in July, I submitted a paper for Springer's Machine Learning. My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. Sometimes the handling administrator or editor are on holiday or busy. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). A delay does not mean that it will be a bad review, and AEs are often not great with the system and leave "awaiting assignment" even if some reviews already came in. The best place on Reddit for admissions advice. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. After two months, it changed to “awaiting recommendation” status. I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. Also, the second round took 8 months. I had one that took 3 weeks, an individual amnesty. This change has occurred After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. 审稿人可能暂时不可用：原审稿人有 Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Resources for authors and journals Upvote this Answer; Comment. I’m currently at 90% and already have migraines service connected at 0%. After 6 weeks I got a decision to reject it though the editor-in-chief acknowledged that the peer my paper went from "under review" to awaiting EIC decision after about 5 and a half weeks. 论文小修后await. Just give it some time; either you will get a decision or it will go for the review process. The reader may still be an admin staffer who conducts editorial screening before passing it to the editor. This change has occurred I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. It seems like 5 weeks is a very short time for it to be peer-reviewed, but almost 6 weeks under review seems like a long time for them to just desk reject it. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. The VA hotline just confirmed my supplemental claim is at pending final review. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. This change has occurred EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. It got past the editor phase and switched to 'Reviewer Assignment Pending', being stuck in that ever since I've contacted the journal twice and got the same response, that it is still awaiting reviewers and that I'll be notified once an update happens. If it’s not going through I don’t know what to do. Check out the sidebar for intro guides. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. " Does it mean that my paper will go through After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. " This status has not been changed for a month. Some editorial systems give the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The second one gave a more thorough review, raised some good questions, and said the general idea is good, but made no comment about whether the article One month since your manuscript moved to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ is a bit long, though not unusual. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. The EiC at that time said they'll look Especially for articles that might not be great fits, AEs are having a hard time finding reviewers and getting them to get reviews in on time. It’s month seven and currently it’s at Co-EIC after first revision. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to [email protected] Submitted my paper. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. Both reviews were positive about the future of the article. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). " What was odd was that the two reviewers for the second round did not talk about my revision at all, but treated the manuscript as a new submission. The other Journal is back after first review. Then I revised and resubmitted. john tizzile john tizzile. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. However, today, The reason is that reviewer#2 refers back to the same old comments that he gave at the major revision stage (He just copied and pasted alll the comments mentioned in the major revision stage The article has been returned to reviewers after a major-revisions decision every time in my experience, both as an author and a reviewer. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. They said a decision has been made but it’s awaiting final review. 5. The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. The submission is now with the author. The title says it all. 査読者の選出待ち. Although I understand this isn’t a long period of time in the grand scheme, for the past two months the paper’s status has cyclically changed from “awaiting reviewer assignment” to “awaiting reviewer selection”. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. But there is still no response. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. Now for the last Something like this: "The paper was initially given a 'minor revision' decision. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Posted by u/Mountain-Ad-4557 - 17 votes and 29 comments After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The paper status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment". However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. This change has occurred Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" means that your paper has cleared teh initial editorial screening and will be sent for peer review. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Many common questions are answered in the Fiverr Help Center and in the Fiverr TOS, which are linked in the subreddit wiki, which also includes links to resources for new sellers looking for tips on getting started the right way. I think the first step is to see how realistic it is to resolve the reviewer comments. Yeah just send the journal a message. 对于论文小修后出现"awaiting reviewer assignment"的情况，通常并不会直接返回给原来的审稿人来审稿。原因有以下几点：1. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than But, now it is showing Awaiting Review. I have contacted the editor in chief (EiC) a few times regarding this. It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. You said you recommended rejection twice now, and somewhat harshly because you perceived fatal flaws (that I assume you don't believe can be addressed in a revision). However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Now I want to submit my manuscript to another journal, but it would be a duplicate submission in this situation. The author is usually given a deadline of a few weeks to a few months; this may be extended upon request, for more information see Can I have extension to submit my revision? Additionally, some journals ask the author to submit a point After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". Really depends on the journal and the editor. These status should not be taken seriously. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". This change Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. I checked this AM and the status is "awaiting resubmission". Awaiting reviewer selection. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. 査読者の決定（返答待ち） Awaiting Reviewer Scores. , if one of the original reviewers was generally happy with your revisions and recommended acceptance (or minor revisions), but the other reviewer was not satisfied and recommended rejection. I had a manuscript that was rejected after "minor revision. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. Then, a few days ago, the status went to "review complete". Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Now, after that reviewer completed the review, that status A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. In October (or November, my bad, I don't remember exactly, I should've taken note) the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer score', and that's what the status says to this day. Know what the reviewers have asked you to do. But the status of the paper is showing "under review" again. After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". The comments were entirely new. We made the changes requested in the minor revision. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it A few days ago, the status said, “Awaiting Post Screening Review. This can happen, e. But how does the editor actually take the decision on a manuscript? This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer review to editorial decision making: how the AE procures the completed reviews, assesses them, and finally comes to a decision on whether to I have submitted the paper on 31st January 2021. I've published in medical journals, in physics/engineering journals and in neuroscience ones. I re-submitted the paper after incorporating these changes in the manuscript (I work in Biology field). Answer this question After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. However, I definitely remember the last two: Once a paper is submitted to a journal, authors eagerly wait for the editorial decision. My personal guideline was to invite new reviewers if the previous reviewer had gone seven days without answering the invitation. it is in the “Awaiting Reviewers Selection” mode once again. kbunlosdpkvpneamdwwexsopxenuusnyejktbioobrgxtqvxmywn